Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX (11-16 f/2.8)

The place to view and share sample images from various lenses! Please ask any questions in the manufacturer sections.

Moderators: Bob Andersson, Thomas, Bjorn van Sinttruije

Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX (11-16 f/2.8)

Postby PCFishHK » Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:59 pm

Image Image

Location: Belle Isle Park, Detroit, Michigan, US
[Click on the image to go to the photo page for original size]

Image Image

Location: Sheung Shui, Hong Kong
[Click on the image to go to the photo page for original size]

PS: Okay guys, I am sorry I posted some processed pictures before which I didn't know I was not suppose to. I am still a newbie. Anyway, these are all the original pictures without processing.
Last edited by PCFishHK on Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:21 am, edited 9 times in total.
PCFishHK
 

Postby alex168 » Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:10 pm

Quite a shame that your processed these photos!


I have heard alot of good things about this lens? What your opinion on it?

But those are some nice shots!
alex168
 

Postby pgtips » Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:41 pm

I think you've missed the point of "lens" galleries. They should be to showcase unprocessed shots so that people have a reliable way of comparing lenses. If you process your shots (which are very good looking!), that defeats the purpose since nobody know what the original output looks like.
pgtips
 

Postby Jatz » Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:26 pm

There are some great shots there. Nice and wide with not much distortion!!

Cant wait to get this lens. :P
Jatz
 

Postby Gregory.Rotter » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:50 am

I think you guys are going a little overboard on the 'OMG NO PROCESSING'. Some of you might shoot in vivid, some in RAW. You're telling methat an image shot with the olympus/canon/nikon equivalent are all going to look the same when each camera has different defaults? If that was the case then we'd all start shouting that the canon variant looked the best as we all know the Canon DSLR's have more sharpening/contrast by default :roll:

If pcFishHK wants to process his images, to give us an idea of what this lens combined with some pp can do I don't see the problem.
Gregory.Rotter
 

Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX (11-16 f/2.8)

Postby ernie728 » Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:09 am

I heard so much about this lens, what I heard from others is a good combo with the 18-200mm VR and this lens is always out of stock due to it's popularity and high demands and as well I heard great reviews on the new Tokina 100mm Macro lens AT-X PRO D f/2.8, well I just purchased the D90 kit lens last Friday online @ Adorama.com I was wondering will Tokina lens like 11-16mm and 100mm macro lens be suitable for the D90 cause I was thinking of getting the Tokina 100mm macro lens instead of the 105mm VR macro lens, as for the arrival date on my D90 it will be arriving on Dec 2 due to the holidays (Thanksgiving weekend) Thanks and keep on shooting

P.S I forgot to mention I know the Tokina 100mm macro lens is more cheaper than the 105mm macro VR lens should I sacrifice the VR to get a 3rd party lens or stick with Nikkor lens to be safe on the safe side
Thanks
ernie728
 

Postby palakaboy » Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:46 am

Nikon D90
16mm 2.8 640 ISO
1/160th
saturation+1

Image
click for larger size

Nikon D90
11mm 2.8 640 ISO
1/125th
saturation +1


nikon D90
11mm 2.8 640 ISO
1/200th
saturation +1

doing a report on a culinary artist from my college

Image
click for larger size

nikon d200
11mm 2.8 100 ISO
1/2000th


Image
click for larger size

Nikon D200
11mm 2.8 100 ISO
1/5000th
-1 ev
palakaboy
 

Postby Adon » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:56 pm

i know i took this a while ago but i am really loving the lens,
this just shows how wide you can get also at full size the detail achievable
Image

Camera: Canon EOS 50D
Exposure: 0.00
Exposure: 0.003 sec (1/320)
Aperture: f/10.0
Focal Length: 11 mm
ISO Speed: 100
Adon
 

Postby Victor Hoffmann » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:01 pm

Great shots!

Victor
Website
User avatar
Victor Hoffmann
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:09 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Postby MistyCreekPhoto » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:17 am

[quote="Adon"]i know i took this a while ago but i am really loving the lens,
this just shows how wide you can get also at full size the detail achievable



Very nice shot mate.
MistyCreekPhoto
 

Postby Kenneth Skou » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:47 am

I have this lens too and it performs really really well. It's a rather more sharp than the much loved Sigma 10-20 - increasingly so, the further away from the center we get.

It's constant aperture and the build quality are pluses too - no money was spent on an AF motor and it is a little more expensive than the Sigma, so one might argue it's a different package altogether though.

As for the post processing, I personally don't mind. Some people don't go out without make up, others don't show pictures they haven't processed. Wait, maybe not the best analogy....

Cheers :-)
Kenneth Skou
 

Postby reqex78 » Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:41 pm

Adon wrote:i know i took this a while ago but i am really loving the lens,
this just shows how wide you can get also at full size the detail achievable


Very nice! :D
reqex78
 

Postby mbrandste » Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:04 pm

Hi all.

those pictures look really great. I ordered this lens a few days ago. Once i got it, i will post some results too. Really looking forward to this lens :) .

greetings
User avatar
mbrandste
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:08 am

Postby KA734 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:18 am

KA734
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:12 pm
Location: Qantas

Postby Stuy23 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:58 pm

I love this lens, its the next on my list. But probably have to wait till I finish uni this year to get one :(
Stuy23
 

Next

Return to Lens gallery - sample images only!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest