Page 2 of 2

PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:09 am
by Tesselator
It's an excellent lens! And it's held it's resale value very well - it's still commonly exchanged for $200 - $250 USD. It's nearly as flatfield at the Nikkor 55/2.8 which is absolute! It's on par sharpness-wise! But the minolta has considerably better color rendition - as is the way with so many Minolta lenses new and old. The working distance is a little short but this lens is perhaps the smallest and lightest 1:1 macro in this IQ class. CA is controlled very well, and it's bokeh for both macro and portraiture range shots is quite pleasant!

I hope kost doesn't mind me adding a few of my images to his thread here. :oops:



Image
1/100s, f/8, ISO400, GH1, 1:1 mag, 100% crop, This little guy could fit under a fingernail. He's about the size of a large grain of beach sand - plus appendages. ;)




Image
1/800s, f/2.8, ISO400, GH1, massive crop, This guy is a new-born - so VERY tiny.




Image
1/200s, f/2.8, ISO640, GH1, deep shade, early morning.




Image
1/125s, f/4 I think, ISO400, GH1.



I really like this lens! It's not as good as the Zeiss C/Y Makro-Planar 100mm f/2.8 but it's extremely good and compares on equal footing or favorably with the likes of the Nikkor 105/2.8D, Tanron SP 90/2.5 (Digital) 1:1, and others costing considerably more.

The focus ring is a little thin but fairly smooth for an AF lens and it's rotational throw is about 210˚ which makes it nice! Mostly between 1:3 and 1:1 the focus ring isn't touched when shooting handheld anyway. One leans in and out to place the focus plane where desired. So the thin grip is not a big deal.

This is probably the poor-man's highest performance option! To get better than this one needs to spend several times this lens's price.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:28 pm
by blindasabat
Stunning photos Tesselator, So sharp and full of colour.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:09 pm
by Tesselator
Thanks Mr. Bat!

You should post up your Frozen Plant shot from the same lens too! It's really pretty!