Hey Warth
I am a massive fan of LR i think its extremely user freindly and once you click with the way it operates import/export and how it treats photos as a data file you can have a heap of fun with it. Photos you review and think..naaaahh suddenly have a new lease of life.
I use raw and jpg but i find that with raw it does give you a lot more control with respect to exposure balance. However i also use JPG and have some great results with this also !
Have a fiddle with LR it really is extremely powerful once you start using it and the way it is designed makes your workflow in PP much more straight forward than in PS or PSE. i used to use PSE and have not used it since i landed LR4.
My favoritie function with LR is the use of graduated filters. I love the fact that i can apply the filter i want to the image i end up with which means i can take the photo as i see it and then let the PP take its own course if it needs it at all ! The graduated filter tool is really powerful and enables you to control the contrast or exposure of the sky for example. The cropping and balance/level tools are really easy to use and an essential part of anyones PP. A must for every landscape photographer as i hate to see oceans that are draining off to one side !
I agree that you shouldnt become a slave to the PP but it really can turn an OK photo into a wall hanger.
Here is a photo that was also taken on a hazy day and was pretty bland and grey until i played with it in LR. I only used LR, nothing else. i used a graduated filter for exposure on the sky a graduated filter for colour cast on the sky, a graduated filter on the gravel foreground for contrast and vibrancy and a spot brush mask with exposure and contrast adjustment on the body of the log. Total time spent in LR on the photo in PP was about 10mins.
log beach 1 colour-1 by
robbon44, on Flickr

Canon 550D, Canon EFS 17-85 IS USM, Canon EF 75-300 IS USM, Canon EFS 10-22mm USM, Canon EF35mm F2.
Got some of the gear but really still no idea...
