Hi,
My priorities are :
1) Excellent lenses for landscape and archtecture shooting (wide angle (24mm), ultra wide angle (10 to 18 mm) or even fish eye)
2) Excellent still and video quality (mic input)
3) compacity
4) better if in body image stabilization
6) general purpose usage for my wife and kids
7) durability (may exceptionaly used in extreme hot temperature and dust (desert in africa))
Budget : under 2200 $ with ultra wide lenses
my current possible choice : sony alpha 7 (no wide angle lenses yet ?) , sony alpha 6000 (E-mounted lenses) , olympus omd em 1 or 5 (with Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 Lens type), panasonic GH3 (with zuiko lens) etc...
which one would be the best given the above list ?
during my reading on the web it seems that for landscape shooting : "bigger the sensor better the result" FF (3/2) and APC-S (3/2 (1.5 crop)) or much better than mico 4/3. is it really what you guys tested ?
is full frame really better than micro 4/3 or APS-C for landscape or architecture shooting given the same type of wide angle lense ?
Regards